Recently while reading an article from Beckett regarding their recent grading of a T206 baseball card collection found last year (I do dabble in baseball card collecting too), a thought that I've had in the past came rushing back: Does Beckett have some major conflicts of interest in the card collecting hobby?
I'm sure I'm not the first to have the thought--in fact, I've discussed it before at my local card shop. But I've not seen a lot of press about it online (very possible I've just missed it--I just really started getting into the hobby blogosphere recently--if you have an article on your blog about it, please send me the link, and I'll link to it).
Just think about it:
So, how is this a conflict of interest?
Well, might there be any pressure to grade some of those T206 cards as 3's rather than as 2.5's, so that the auction price goes up a little more, thereby raising their commissions? Similarly, might there be some encouragement to to make sure that other cards are graded a little higher, or that non-graded prices are kept higher, so that their marketplace (and even the overall market) keeps going strong?
Of course, if that's the case, we're all sitting on a time bomb of a hobby. Although personally, I'm assuming that Beckett has some safety systems in place to ensure that one hand isn't influencing the other--although it would be nice to hear more about them. And anyway, I'm guessing that one little old blogger, writing his 6th post for his site, isn't likely to change the world. At least not overnight.
![]() |
Subscribe via RSS |
| What is RSS? |