The Football Card Blog

After the kerfuffle over the Beckett Video Box Break of two boxes of Upper Deck Exquisite, one would hope that Beckett would tread very carefully with their next round of box breaks.  And while they do play it somewhat safe, by opening a box of 2008 Press Pass, which is significantly less impactful on the wallet than Exquisite, and point out explcitly that it was taken "off the production line at the printing facility north of Dallas," some people may still ask a few questions...

The first question someone may ask would be on the timing--Press Pass isn't shipping until next week, but they get the box to open early.  Doesn't particularly bother me, as they're in the press, and it's a good move by the Press Pass folks to build some buzz early.  But given the kerfuffle, I am a bit surprised that they went for a break of product that won't hit the public for a bit yet.

The second question is that of star player cards--a question that will likely be asked of every single future Beckett Box Break, given the Adrian Peterson 1/1 pull.  In the box of 2008 Press Pass, they pulled two Matt Ryan parallels (one #'d to 500), a Matt Ryan jersey (#'d to 150), and a Darren McFadden insert, along with a handful of other likely first round picks.

Given Matt Ryan's status as likely being the first QB taken in the draft, some might raise eyebrows at this.  Of course, in a product like Press Pass, it's tough to say that's not somewhat normal.

In the end, I'd say this break shouldn't raise too much of an uproar.  But there will likely be some collector's who disagree...

Of course, the much bigger news out of all of this in my eyes is that the 2008 Football Card Season is just around the corner!

Recently while reading an article from Beckett regarding their recent grading of a T206 baseball card collection found last year (I do dabble in baseball card collecting too), a thought that I've had in the past came rushing back: Does Beckett have some major conflicts of interest in the card collecting hobby?

I'm sure I'm not the first to have the thought--in fact, I've discussed it before at my local card shop.  But I've not seen a lot of press about it online (very possible I've just missed it--I just really started getting into the hobby blogosphere recently--if you have an article on your blog about it, please send me the link, and I'll link to it).

Just think about it:

• Beckett sets the value for cards across the hobby (with a great deal of research, I'm sure, although I tend to think some of that is hogwash, just based on some common values, and the consistency of some cards, but that's a whole 'nother topic that may deserve its own post). 
• Beckett also grades cards.  In and of itself, that should be fine, even with the fear that I know some of my fellow collectors have about Beckett possibly not returning the same cards that were sent in.
• However, Beckett also has an online marketplace, which I'm assuming they make money on, whether it's a percentage of sale like eBay, or just a listing payment from sellers (I wasn't easily able to figure that out on their site--a whole 'nother topic, and likely a whole 'nother post).
• Finally, from the T206 article, Beckett is also now (or has been for awhile?) putting on their own auctions, through the Beckett Select Auctions division of Beckett Media.

So, how is this a conflict of interest?

Well, might there be any pressure to grade some of those T206 cards as 3's rather than as 2.5's, so that the auction price goes up a little more, thereby raising their commissions?  Similarly, might there be some encouragement to to make sure that other cards are graded a little higher, or that non-graded prices are kept higher, so that their marketplace (and even the overall market) keeps going strong?

Of course, if that's the case, we're all sitting on a time bomb of a hobby.  Although personally, I'm assuming that Beckett has some safety systems in place to ensure that one hand isn't influencing the other--although it would be nice to hear more about them.  And anyway, I'm guessing that one little old blogger, writing his 6th post for his site, isn't likely to change the world.  At least not overnight.

 Next entries »